PMWS & PCVD
![]() |
|
This free resource is kindly supported by:
If you have a information you would like is to include in this section please contact us
Vaccination
Management
Disease Information
A PMWS update (Jake Waddilove)
ABOUT PMWS & PDNS National Pork Board PMWS Fact Sheet About PDNS (Jake Waddilive) CEI Emerging Disease Notices: PMWS / PDNS Conference and meetings archive
Case Histories
Yorkshire Farm, UK - Mike Muirhead - Final Update, June 2002
Mike Muirhead's case history of a Yorkshire farm with PMWS and PDNS. This paper charts the course and effects of the disease on a single herd as well as highlighting the economic impact. Photographs
Clinical signs
Photos of the clinical signs that are seen generally in pigs with PMWS and PDNS. Includes skin lesions, enlarged lymph glands, wasting and dead pigs. Photos of the signs that are seen in post-mortem samples of pigs with PMWS and PDNS. Includes interstitial pneumonia, secondary bacterial infection, enlarged lymph nodes, oedema and intra cytoplasmic inclusions More Photos of the signs that are seen in post-mortem samples of pigs with PMWS and PDNS.
PMWS Research ArchivesPublished Sunday, January 04, 2009: Canadian Journal Vet Res. 2009 January; 73(1): 7–14.Ring Tests to Evaluate the Performance of Porcine Circovirus-2 (PCV-2) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assays used in North American Diagnostic Laboratories John C.S. Harding, Crissie Baker, Carrie Rhodes, Kathleen A. McIntosh, and Martin Bonneau Two laboratory studies involving 11 laboratories were undertaken to assess the performance of North American Porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Laboratories received identical submissions containing randomly coded positive and negative control samples, and serially diluted PCV-2-spiked samples. In study 1 and 2, respectively, spiked samples contained measured amounts of PCV-2 virus or DNA. All but 1 assay detected DNA in the most concentrated spiked sample. There were no statistical differences in the proportion of positive or negative samples reported by quantitative (n = 7) versus non-quantitative (n = 6) assays. Across both studies, the false positive rate was 17% (4 out of 23), and 17% (2 out of 12) of assays cross-reacted with PCV-1. The most sensitive assay detected PCV-2 DNA levels about 100 000 times lower the least sensitive assay. This study demonstrated that the PCR assays available in North American diagnostic labs vary considerably in their detection limits and quantification. To continue reading this article please click here Have you published information? To add please email the details |
Our Sponsors
Partners




















© 2000 - 2012. 5m Publishing, Benchmark House, 8 Smithy Wood Drive, Sheffield, S35 1QN, England.