PMWS & PCVD
![]() |
|
This free resource is kindly supported by:
If you have a information you would like is to include in this section please contact us
Vaccination
Management
Disease Information
A PMWS update (Jake Waddilove)
ABOUT PMWS & PDNS National Pork Board PMWS Fact Sheet About PDNS (Jake Waddilive) CEI Emerging Disease Notices: PMWS / PDNS Conference and meetings archive
Case Histories
Yorkshire Farm, UK - Mike Muirhead - Final Update, June 2002
Mike Muirhead's case history of a Yorkshire farm with PMWS and PDNS. This paper charts the course and effects of the disease on a single herd as well as highlighting the economic impact. Photographs
Clinical signs
Photos of the clinical signs that are seen generally in pigs with PMWS and PDNS. Includes skin lesions, enlarged lymph glands, wasting and dead pigs. Photos of the signs that are seen in post-mortem samples of pigs with PMWS and PDNS. Includes interstitial pneumonia, secondary bacterial infection, enlarged lymph nodes, oedema and intra cytoplasmic inclusions More Photos of the signs that are seen in post-mortem samples of pigs with PMWS and PDNS.
PMWS Research ArchivesPublished Friday, October 16, 2009: Veterinary Microbiology, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 16 October 2009Comparison of the Effectiveness of Passive (Dam) Versus Active (Piglet) Immunization Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2) and Impact of Passively Derived PCV2 Vaccine-Induced Immunity on Vaccination Tanja Opriessnig, Abby R. Patterson, Darin M. Madson, Narinder Pal, Sheela Ramamoorthy, Xiang-Jin Meng, Patrick G. Halbur The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the efficacy of two different PCV2 vaccination protocols (colostrum-derived immunity versus piglet vaccination) in a conventional PCV2 growing pig challenge model and (2) to evaluate the efficacy of vaccinating piglets with the same vaccine used in the dams. Two different commercially available vaccines (VAC1; VAC2) were used in the same experiment. Seventy-eight piglets born to vaccinated or non-vaccinated sows were divided into 8 groups. A proportion of the pigs with and a proportion of the pigs without passively acquired immunity were vaccinated at 21 days of age. All pigs except negative controls were challenged with PCV2b at 35 days post-vaccination and necropsied at 21 days post-challenge (dpc). The data indicates that both dam vaccination and piglet vaccination had similar efficacies in reducing PCV2 viral loads and antigen levels in the growing pigs. Interestingly, dam vaccination alone did result in significantly (P < 0.05) lower anti-PCV2-antibodies levels at challenge in piglets from dams immunized with VAC2 compared to piglets from VAC1 immunized dams. When data obtained from the growing piglets that were vaccinated with VAC1 or VAC2 were compared, antibody levels and reduction of incidence of PCV2-antigen were not different; however, piglets vaccinated with VAC2 had reduced PCV2-DNA genomic copies in serum by 21 dpc. Vaccination of piglets with the same vaccine as was used on their dams did not appear to affect vaccine efficacy as piglets in these groups had anti-PCV2-antibody levels and PCV2 genomic copies similar to the groups where vaccine was administered to the piglets only. To continue reading this article please click here Have you published information? To add please email the details |
Our Sponsors
Partners




















© 2000 - 2012. 5m Publishing, Benchmark House, 8 Smithy Wood Drive, Sheffield, S35 1QN, England.