Controlled exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is valuable tool for eliminating the pathogen
References | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Fano E, Pijoan C, Dee S, Deen J. Effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae colonization at weaning on disease severity in growing pigs. Can J Vet Res. 2007;71:195-200. | ||||
2 Yeske P. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Elimination. 2016 AASV Proceedings. 376-381. | ||||
3 Toohill E. Achieving Day 0 in Large Swine Operations. 2017 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, Saint Paul, MN. | ||||
4 Yeske P. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae lateral transmission and gilt exposure methods. 2018 AASV Proceedings. 482-484. | ||||
5 Pieters M, Pijoan C, Fano E, Dee S. An assessment of the duration of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in an experimentally infected population of pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2009;134:261-266. | ||||
6 Roos L, Fano E, Homwong N, Payne B, Pieters M. A model to investigate the optimal seeder-to-naïve ratio for successful natural Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae gilt exposure prior to entering the breeding herd. Vet Microbiol. 2016;194:51-58. | ||||
7 Sponheim A. A Diagnostic Approach to Confirm Day Zero. 2017 Allen Leman Swine Conference. St. Paul, MN. | ||||
8 Toohill E. Achieving Day 0 in Large Swine Operations. | ||||
9 Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. 2018 AASV Meeting Proceedings. 97-98. | ||||
10 Toohill E. Achieving Day 0 in Large Swine Operations. | ||||
11]Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. | ||||
12 Hewitt K, Hensch M, Maschhoff A. A comparison of media alternatives for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae aerosol exposure. 2020 AASV Meeting Proceedings. | ||||
13 Ibid. | ||||
14 Robbins RC, Betlach AM, Mondragon-Evans MR, et al. Development of a herd-specific lung homogenate for exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions. J Swine Health Prod. 2019;27(4):221-227. | ||||
15 Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. | ||||
16 Robbins RC, Betlach AM, Mondragon-Evans MR, et al. Development of a herd-specific lung homogenate for exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions. | ||||
17 Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. | ||||
18 Robbins RC, Betlach AM, Mondragon-Evans MR, et al. Development of a herd-specific lung homogenate for exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions. | ||||
19 Ibid. | ||||
20 Leone S, Maschhoff A, Lehman J. Evaluation of various ante-mortem sentinel pig sampling techniques for detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae following seeder pig exposure. 2018 AASV Meeting Proceedings. 82-83. | ||||
21 Ibid. | ||||
22 Dalquist, L et al. 2016. IPVS Ante-morteum vs post-morteum sampling procedure comparison for detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by PCR and influence of pooling on results. IPVS Proceedings. 317. | ||||
23 Marois C, Dory D, Fablet C, Madec F, Kobisch M. Development of a quantitative real-time TaqMan PCR assay for determination of the minimal dose of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 116 required to induce pneumonia in SPF pigs. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108(5):1523-1533 | ||||
24 Gourgues S, Fano E, Sabaté A, Grasa E, Caravaca I, Vázquez F, Vega V, Garvia-Morante B. Assessment of nebulization technology for gilt exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as an acclimation strategy. J. Swine Health Prod. 2020;28(6):294-301./small> | ||||