Agricultural, Food Groups Urge Support For TPP

US - The National Pork Producers Council joined 225 other agricultural and food organisations in expressing support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and in urging congressional lawmakers to back the deal.
calendar icon 14 April 2016
clock icon 3 minute read

The TPP, negotiations on which concluded last October, is a regional trade deal that includes the United States, Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam, which account for nearly 40 per cent of global GDP.

“If faithfully implemented, TPP will help level the playing field for US exports and create new opportunities for us in the highly competitive Asia-Pacific region,” said the agricultural and food groups in a letter to Senate and House leaders.

NPPC believes the deal could be the “biggest commercial opportunity ever for US pork producers.” Iowa State University economist Dermot Hayes estimates the agreement will exponentially increase US pork exports to Pacific Rim countries and help create more than 10,000 US jobs tied to those exports.

“While US pork producers support the TPP, it is imperative to make sure other countries do not artificially stimulate pork production through support programs in a way that will undermine the concessions they made in the TPP negotiations,” said NPPC President John Weber, a pork producer from Dysart, Iowa.

“We appreciate the strong support we are receiving from both the Obama administration and Congress to ensure that US pork producers receive the full benefit of the TPP deal. There are still some critically important issues that need to be worked through, but I’m confident they will be resolved well before Congress votes on the deal.”

In addition to removing export barriers, the TPP agreement includes high-standard rules that will encourage market-driven and science-based terms of trade that will help the US food and agriculture industry compete in the Asia-Pacific region, the agricultural and food groups pointed out in their letter.

Click here to read the letter.

© 2000 - 2022 - Global Ag Media. All Rights Reserved | No part of this site may be reproduced without permission.