Controlled exposure to M. hyo is valuable tool for eliminating the pathogen
Controlled exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyo) has drawn more interest in the swine industry due to a better understanding of the shedding dynamics from unstable animals within the farrowing house and its impact on the downstream herd.1,2 Controlled exposure is also useful for establishing day 03,4 in M. hyo-elimination programs.
2 July 2021
2 minute read
By: 
| References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Fano E, Pijoan C, Dee S, Deen J. Effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae colonization at weaning on disease severity in growing pigs. Can J Vet Res. 2007;71:195-200. | ||||
| 2 Yeske P. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Elimination. 2016 AASV Proceedings. 376-381. | ||||
| 3 Toohill E. Achieving Day 0 in Large Swine Operations. 2017 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, Saint Paul, MN. | ||||
| 4 Yeske P. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae lateral transmission and gilt exposure methods. 2018 AASV Proceedings. 482-484. | ||||
| 5 Pieters M, Pijoan C, Fano E, Dee S. An assessment of the duration of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in an experimentally infected population of pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2009;134:261-266. | ||||
| 6 Roos L, Fano E, Homwong N, Payne B, Pieters M. A model to investigate the optimal seeder-to-naïve ratio for successful natural Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae gilt exposure prior to entering the breeding herd. Vet Microbiol. 2016;194:51-58. | ||||
| 7 Sponheim A. A Diagnostic Approach to Confirm Day Zero. 2017 Allen Leman Swine Conference. St. Paul, MN. | ||||
| 8 Toohill E. Achieving Day 0 in Large Swine Operations. | ||||
| 9 Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. 2018 AASV Meeting Proceedings. 97-98. | ||||
| 10 Toohill E. Achieving Day 0 in Large Swine Operations. | ||||
| 11]Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. | ||||
| 12 Hewitt K, Hensch M, Maschhoff A. A comparison of media alternatives for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae aerosol exposure. 2020 AASV Meeting Proceedings. | ||||
| 13 Ibid. | ||||
| 14 Robbins RC, Betlach AM, Mondragon-Evans MR, et al. Development of a herd-specific lung homogenate for exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions. J Swine Health Prod. 2019;27(4):221-227. | ||||
| 15 Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. | ||||
| 16 Robbins RC, Betlach AM, Mondragon-Evans MR, et al. Development of a herd-specific lung homogenate for exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions. | ||||
| 17 Nickel M, Toohill E, Lehman J. Use of a hurricane fogger for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae inoculation in nursery age gilts. | ||||
| 18 Robbins RC, Betlach AM, Mondragon-Evans MR, et al. Development of a herd-specific lung homogenate for exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions. | ||||
| 19 Ibid. | ||||
| 20 Leone S, Maschhoff A, Lehman J. Evaluation of various ante-mortem sentinel pig sampling techniques for detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae following seeder pig exposure. 2018 AASV Meeting Proceedings. 82-83. | ||||
| 21 Ibid. | ||||
| 22 Dalquist, L et al. 2016. IPVS Ante-morteum vs post-morteum sampling procedure comparison for detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by PCR and influence of pooling on results. IPVS Proceedings. 317. | ||||
| 23 Marois C, Dory D, Fablet C, Madec F, Kobisch M. Development of a quantitative real-time TaqMan PCR assay for determination of the minimal dose of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 116 required to induce pneumonia in SPF pigs. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108(5):1523-1533 | ||||
| 24 Gourgues S, Fano E, Sabaté A, Grasa E, Caravaca I, Vázquez F, Vega V, Garvia-Morante B. Assessment of nebulization technology for gilt exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as an acclimation strategy. J. Swine Health Prod. 2020;28(6):294-301./small> | ||||
