ShapeShapeauthorShapechevroncrossShapeShapeShapeGrouphamburgerhomeGroupmagnifyShapeShapeShaperssShape

Cost of Production Forecast – US versus Canada Comparison

by 5m Editor
17 November 2009, at 12:00am

Grant Lazaruk from Hytek Ltd explains how the pig industries in Canada and the US compare in terms of the technical aspects of pig production, processing and marketing. He was addressing the Banff Pork Seminar earlier this year.


Introduction

The cost of production is a key driver for the success of a commodity business; specifically, this presentation addresses the business of pork production and identify competitive advantages and disadvantages of Canadian production compared to the US systems.

The pork production chain can be classified into the following categories:

  • Hog production
  • Processing fresh meat
  • Marketing of fresh meat

When comparing US versus Canadian production, the author first defines what is an ideal pork production system. The ideal production system optimises revenue with cost-effective manufacturing at both the farms and the processing plants.

The Ideal Pork Production System

Hog Production

Feed represents 60 per cent of the hog production cost and 40 per cent of the total cost of final pork products. Three pounds of feed are required to produce a pound of meat. Location of the mill should be near the feed source and location of the farm should be near the mill. Transporting meat to market is more cost-efficient than hauling ingredients to feed mills or hauling feed to barns.

Breeding/gestation/farrowing barns, nursery barns and finishing barns should be clustered as near to each other as possible to minimise transportation costs of live hogs.

Barns should be in an area with a strong labour force. Production efficiency is a key driver for keeping per unit costs down.

The ideal pork production system includes facilities located in an area that is not too densely populated with hogs as this provides the ability to maintain a healthy herd.

Manure is a valuable resource that is utilised effectively for crop production. Ideally, hog production is in a sustainable environment where these nutrients can be managed in a cost-effective manner.

Processing

Processing plants need to be located in the area of the pig production to minimise transportation costs of the live pigs. Transportation of live pigs is a most inefficient use of transportation resources and the distance needs to be kept to a minimum. Transporting meat to market is more cost efficient than hauling live pigs to the processing plant.

Processing plants should be located in an area with a strong labour force. Having the sufficient number of employees is important but more important is having access to qualified employees because production efficiency is a key driver for keeping per unit costs down.

An operationally efficient plant is one that has the ability to customise products to the customer’s specifications while capable of harvesting the entire hog. There is an appropriate market for every part of the hog and waste should be minimal.

Processing plants that deal with the variability of the pigs allow ‘all-in/all-out’ hog barns to be emptied, thus eliminating pig selection with a narrow weight window at barn level and maximising the size of the pig to its genetic and economic capabilities.

Asset utilisation is maximised with a large-scale double-shift plant that utilises economies of scale and processes for the majority of the day.

Marketing, Warehousing and Transportation

Ideal marketing, warehousing and transportation is recognising and having access to the market with the best return for each part of the hog. This includes domestic and international markets for maximising your sales returns.

Effective distribution facilities and an expedient transportation network to your customer are essential. This means access by truck, train or ocean vessel as necessary to deliver product to the customer in a timely manner.

Key Areas to Success and the Challenges We Face

Feed Costs

Feed is the single largest cost in pork production. The most influential factor in the success or failure of a pork production system is the availability of feed at competitive pricing. Include the rising cost of fuel and feed becomes expensive; production facilities must be located near a feed source. Biofuel companies are competing with the swine industry for corn and have caused corn prices to reach an all-time high. The price of feed has pushed our overall production costs to levels of negative margins; with demand steady the only solution is a reduction in the hog supply. This liquidation has been seen worldwide. We estimate that if our cost structure increases by 30 per cent, then the price of pork would need to increase by 30 per cent, which will require a reduction in supply of approximately seven to 10 per cent.

Transportation/fuel

Hog production requires a lot of fuel. Transportation is an influencing expense. Ingredients are delivered to the feed mills, feed is delivered to the barns, pigs are transported from barn to barn, pigs are delivered to a processing plant and the pork is delivered to the customer. Minimising transportation costs is crucial to an efficient pork production system.

Labour

The largest influence on overall productivity is labour. Labour costs represent approximately 15 per cent of the total cost structure for pork production. While rates affect cost, overall productivity is the larger contributing factor. Take into consideration the number of pigs per sow; two less pigs per sow increase your total cost by $2.70 per pig. A 0.1 increase in feed conversion will increase your costs by $2.60 per pig. A decrease in yield at the plant of 1 per cent will decrease your revenue by $2.0 per hog. These are affected not by the wage of the employee but the quality of the employee. Experienced staff directly impacts the cost per pig.

Asset utilisation

Pork production is very asset intensive and it is crucial to ensure every asset is being used to its maximum capability. For biosecurity purposes, it is common in North America for three-site hog production. While this nurtures a healthy barn environment, it lowers utilisation of barn assets. There is the additional expense of washing time in nursery and finisher barns and unutilised space in the finish barn during the period of marketing. The author estimates that 12 to 15 per cent of hog production assets are under-utilised. Processing facilities are being under-utilised if they function only during a single shift, even with down time for cleanup and repairs a processing plant can be in operation for 16 hours a day.

Conclusion: Competitive Advantages Canada versus US

Further Reading

- You can view other papers from Banff Pork Seminar 2009 by clicking here.


November