Is the intradermal vaccination against PRRS as efficacious as the intramuscular one??
The advantages of the intradermal (ID) administration by a needle-less device are that it is less invasive, painless, safe, quick and easy. Furthermore, the ID administration could induce a stronger cellular response compared to the intramuscular (IM) due to the delivery through the ID route could induce T cell polarization favoring the induction of interferon gamma secreting cells (IFN-γ-SC). In PRRSV infection, interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels are reportedly associated with severity of clinical disease (van Reeth and Nauwynck, 2000) and can delay the immune response. Higher IFN-γ-SC in ID vaccinated pigs could be due to the lower IL-10 levels.