ShapeShapeauthorShapechevroncrossShapeShapeShapeGrouphamburgerhomeGroupmagnifyShapeShapeShaperssShape

Livestock Price Outlook - April 2004

by 5m Editor
21 April 2004, at 12:00am

By Chris Hurt, Extension Economist, Purdue University - In his latest Outlook report, Chris Hurt indicates that pork supplies are expected to be at record high levels in 2004, but stronger domestic and foreign demand will help keep prices above year-ago levels.

Chris Hurt
Extension Economist
Purdue University

Hog Producers: Take losses now and wait for a better day?

The other major factor impacting the industry will be feed costs. Costs of production are currently estimated to be near $50 per live hundredweight. On two previous occasions, costs have reached or exceeded $50. Those were in 1984 and 1996. In 1996, corn prices were above $4.00 for an entire calendar quarter (spring of 1996), but meal prices, at about $265 per ton, were much lower than currently.

Hog prices are not expected to be at the lofty levels of costs, thus losses are anticipated. During the 12 months from April 2004 through March 2005, costs of production are expected to be $47.75 compared to hog values of $43.50 for 51 percent to 52 percent lean carcasses, resulting in a loss of about $4.00 per hundredweight. The largest losses are expected to be $5 per hundredweight this summer and $8 per hundredweight in the fall.

Costs over the next year could still be highly variable based upon how weather and international demand factors evolve for corn and soybeans over the next several months. Even higher feed prices will occur if weather concerns reduce U.S. yields. This makes the next 12 months a vulnerable period for hog producer returns. Prices of $4.00 per bushel for corn and $375 per ton for soybean meal would escalate estimated costs to $55 per live hundredweight.

Lean hog futures are currently above estimated hog prices forecast in this report. Current hedging opportunities for lean hogs, corn, and soybean meal prices could give producers a nearly breakeven situation. The advantage of hedging now is the reduction of risk associated with the potential for catastrophic losses should feed prices continue to move higher this summer and force greater hog liquidation in the summer and fall.

As a general statement, higher feed costs in 2004 will result in higher hog prices from mid-2005 to mid-2007. The challenge is to survive the next year before this two year period of profitability can be reached.

The Numbers

On March 1, USDA reported 1.7 percent fewer animals in the breeding herd. U.S producers have decreased the breeding herd for the seventh consecutive quarter, dating back to September 2002. While the U.S. herd has been dropping, pork production has continued to rise with more pigs per litter, higher weights, and continued increases in live hog imports from Canada. In fact, pork production was at record high levels in 2003, and that number is expected to move even higher in 2004.

A number of states have reduced their breeding herds relative to year-previous levels. These include: Missouri (-8 percent); Indiana (-6 percent); Nebraska (-5 percent); and Iowa and Illinois (-2 percent). Kansas has expanded the herd over the past year by 6 percent and Oklahoma has expanded by 3 percent.

Eastern Corn Belt states continue to have a reduced portion of the U.S. sows. In 1990, the states of Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio had 22 percent of the U.S. breeding herd. That moved to 20 percent in 1995, and has dropped to under 15 percent currently. Breeding herds in both Illinois and Indiana have been reduced by 40,000 animals since 2000.

Producers intend to reduce farrowings by 1 percent this spring and by 2 percent in the summer (Table 1). This will potentially provide smaller pork supplies late in 2004 and early 2005.

More Pork and Higher Prices

Pork production in 2004 is expected to reach nearly 20.4 billion pounds, exceeding the record of 19.9 billion of last year. This represents an increase of 2 percent over last year's record. The larger supplies are a result of the large supply of pigs that were under 120 pounds on March 1 (nearly 3 percent higher) and from continued growth of imports of Canadian SEW pigs and market hogs as production expands there (breeding herd up 3 percent).

Pork supplies in the second and third quarters are expected to be higher by two to 3 percent, before falling about 1 percent in the last quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. (See Tables 3 and 4.) Market weights are expected to be up only .4 percent or about .85 pounds per carcass in the next 12 months compared to the last 12 month period. This is below the long-term trend in growth in weights due to higher feed prices. Over the past five years, carcass weights have had an annual average increase near 1 percent per year.

Live hog prices are expected to average $43.50 per live hundredweight for 2004, an increase of 10 percent over $39.45 in 2003. The highest prices are expected in the spring and early summer when prices may reach near $50 for some daily highs. Lower prices are expected in the summer when they are expected to average in the mid-$40s. Fall prices are still expected to be the lowest of the year and be in the very high $30s, with recovery in the first quarter of 2005 to the lower $40s. In the 12 month period from April 1, 2004 through March of 2005, hog prices are expected to average $43.53.

Costs to Exceed Hog Prices

Costs of production have moved up sharply in 2004 as a result of higher feed prices. In addition, weather and grain demand make additional feed cost increases possible into the summer. At the start of the year, cash corn prices in central Indiana and Illinois were about $2.40 per bushel and have risen to $3.20 at this writing. High protein meal prices have increased about $100 per ton. The combination of these two has increased costs of production on a liveweight basis by about $7.75 since the start of the year. Given current feed ingredient prices, costs of production is now estimated at $49.50 per live hundredweight and hog producers have entered a period of potentially large losses.

Quarterly hog costs near, or above, $50 have occurred four other times-in 1981, 1984, 1988, and 1996. Three of these cost surges were led by the droughts of 1980, 1983, and 1988. The 1996 high costs were led by small 1995 crops and by extremely strong demand. In three of these four years, the high costs of production led the industry into substantial losses: 1981, 1984, and 1988. Only in 1996 were hog prices sufficiently high to keep the industry from dropping into loss. The period of losses around the high feed prices tends to result in a decline in sow numbers one to two quarters later and a decline in farrowing three to four quarters later. This only occurs if the high feed prices push the industry into losses as appears will be the case this spring and summer.

The problem for the pork industry is that producers generally have to take their financial losses from higher feed prices before they receive compensation in the form of higher hog prices one to two years later. The compensation comes after the herd is reduced during and immediately following the high price feed period. After the breeding herd is reduced, farrowings drop and pork supplies decline six months later.

Given the expected losses in the second through the fourth quarter of this year, the breeding herd would be expected to decline in the summer and fall, with farrowings dropping in the final quarter of 2004 and into the first-half of 2005. This means that hog prices would respond by moving up to profitable levels by the spring and summer of 2005. Then, a period of profitable hog prices would be expected from mid-2005 through mid-2007.

The point is, pork producers must find a way to get through the high feed price year to earn their compensation in the two years following the high feed price year. Given high feed prices in 2004, this means the profit compensation may come in 2005 and 2006.

Over the 12 months from April 2004 through March of 2005, costs of production are expected to be $47.75 compared to hog values of $43.50 for 51 percent to 52 percent lean carcasses. This implies a loss of about $4.00 per hundredweight. Losses are expected to be $5 per hundredweight in the summer and reach $8 per hundredweight in the fall. These will be the largest losses since the fall of 2002.

Upcoming potential losses would extend a long-term losing streak. In the three year period from the spring of 2002 through the first quarter of 2005, the industry would have shown losses in 10 of the 12 quarters. While there can be substantial error in these costs estimates, on the surface this suggests that the U.S. industry must continue to cut the herd even more aggressively.

It should be clear that there are many dynamics to both hog prices and feed prices this year. Hog prices are always difficult to predict, but that uncertainty is even greater due to questions of how beef, broiler, and pork trade will unfold this year. Everyone knows the potential volatility that will likely occur in corn and soybean meal prices. Thus, both costs of production and hog revenues have considerable potential to vary from the numbers forecast here.

Exports Carry the Price Load

It is not reduced pork supplies that have given higher than expected late-winter prices, but rather demand. Most likely this is related to both domestic and export demand. Domestic demand may have strengthened due to a strong U.S. economy and rising consumer incomes. Personal incomes have been rising at an annualized rate of near 5 percent. While we generally don't think pork is as directly impact by higher incomes as beef, there does seem to be a big surge in pork demand at this time.

In the export market, the data lags by about two months making it difficult to evaluate how much of the higher spring prices are due to trade. However, with broiler exports and beef exports largely shut off due to bird flu and BSE, it is likely that most of the demand strength is coming from foreign countries. In January, pork exports were up 14 percent, while imports were unchanged.

It is assumed that foreign countries have substituted more pork purchases from the U.S. for lost beef and broiler imports. In January, the first full month after the discovery of BSE, reduced beef exports led to only a small amount of additional pork exports. U.S. beef exports dropped by 190 million pounds, yet pork exports were only up by 24 million pounds for the month. It was early February when the bird flu hit the U.S., so the data for February will show steep drops in broiler exports in February and March as well. Most likely, pork exports have been remarkable in these two months.

Unfortunately for pork, broiler exports will likely be reinstated over the next several months. In past outbreaks of avian influenza (AI), most countries have moved to a state-by-state restriction. AI has been in the states of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Maryland. Mexico has already moved to restrict imports from these states only. If other countries also move to do so, this will allow increased broiler exports in a relatively short period of time. (Portions of this paragraph are based upon information from USDA analyst in the Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook, LDP-M-117, March 23, 2004).

As broiler and beef imports are reinstated, pork exports are likely to decline into the summer and fall. This may mean that hog prices will not be able to sustain the prices of the spring and early summer. Of course, the exact time when this might occur are not known at this time.

Alternatives for the Industry

Pork producers face a vulnerable year when feed prices are expected to exceed hog revenues. Hog prices on a liveweight basis for 51 percent to 52 percent lean carcasses are expected to average $43.50 over the coming 12 months with costs of production about $4.00 higher. The largest losses may come in the fall when they are expected to reach nearly $8 per live hundredweight. There of course remains the possibility for prices to be much different than currently expected. That uncertainty is both on the lower and the higher side.

Lean hog futures at the current time are providing expected prices higher than price estimates in this report. As of the close of markets on April 5, futures were estimating 51 percent to 52 percent carcasses to average about $46 per live hundredweight. This is $2.50 higher than my forecasts and provides an opportunity for many producers to come close to breaking even over the next 12 months. A general philosophy is to attempt to breakeven during the high price feed year, and then stay unpriced for the following two years as reduced hog populations begin to compensate hog producers for the high feed costs year.

My best thought on timing is for hog prices to move to profitable levels in the summer of 2005 and then for returns to have a positive run from mid-2005 to mid-2007.

In terms of corn and soybean meal prices this spring, I have been suggesting that without weather concerns, spring would bring the highest corn prices of the year, and that soybean meal peaks might be in the spring or early summer.

On the other hand, hog producers must also face the possibility of weather reduced yields. I quote the longer-term odds of a major distortion to the corn or bean crop at about one out of five. The trouble is that if the harmful weather should come this summer, it could mean catastrophic financial losses for hog producers. Catastrophic losses could be $55 costs with hogs in the mid-$30 if rapid sow liquidation occurs in the late summer and fall. While the odds do not favor this as the most-likely scenario, most hog producers should consider hedging hogs and feed such that they can nearly lock-in a breakeven situation and avoid the 20 percent odds of catastrophic losses. Taking small losses now by hedging production over the next 9 to 12 months and remaining unpriced for most of 2005 and 2006 is a potential strategy.

The breeding herd size is declining with more liquidation likely to follow, regardless of what happens to feed prices. This favors a general tendency toward higher hog prices and better returns into 2005 and 2006


Source: Farm.Doc - April 2004